Archive for July, 2011

 

Women’s ‘Arrest Law’: Warning

Sunday, July 24th, 2011

Recently, we received the email below:

DO YOU KNOW THIS LAW?

An incident took place – a young girl was attacked by a man posing as a plain clothes officer; he asked her to come to the police station when she & her male friend didn’t have a driver’s license to show. He sent the male friend off to get his license and asked the girl to accompany him to the police station. Instead he took her to an isolated area where the rape was committed.

The law [which most of us are not aware of] clearly states that between 6 pm and 6 am, a woman has the right to REFUSE to go to the Police Station, even if an arrest warrant has been issued against her.

It is procedural that a woman can only be arrested between 6am and 6pm, unless she is arrested by a woman officer and taken to an ALL WOMEN police station. If she is arrested by a male officer, it has to be proven that a

woman officer was on duty at the time of arrest.

Please fwd this to as many girls/women you know. Guys, protect your wives, sisters and mothers by knowing this law. It is good for us to know our rights.

Do not neglect, fwd to your entire buddy list.

———————————————————————————————————————–

After some research, we identified that this email is a hoax which has been circulating the internet for a few years and has been credited in various forms in different countries throughout the world. Although a law such as this would be great in terms of our high rate of rape in South Africa, it is simply not true.

One thing which females should remember if they are arrested, is that under the Criminal Procedures Act, a woman can only be searched by a female police officer. This is your right and if this is not performed by a female you have the right to insist that it is.

If you come across any emails such as this, please do not forward this incorrect information further. Although your intentions are noble, by passing on these hoax emails, you could inadvertently cause someone to be charged with refusing arrest, if they believe that these emails are true.

Misleading view of the database: Update

Monday, July 11th, 2011

We previously blogged about a letter criticizing Chris Asplen’s letter in The Witness. The final response published in reaction to Ms. de Haas’s letter was edited down and published, which promptly received a response. It is unfortunate someone in the public does not consider the change in legislation and the new DNA bill as vital to decreasing the shocking statistics of rape and murder in our beautiful country. In response, Dr Carolyn Hancock has highlighted some of the cases in SA where a DNA database would no doubt have saved many lives and where DNA evidence was used successfully.

There has recently been debate in the press on whether South Africa needs a DNA database. In an effort to highlight the incredible potential of this form of evidence, I thought it may be a good idea to write about some of South Africa’s most notorious criminals and their victims.

Moses Sithole began raping women in his twenties, claiming 3 victims before one testified. He was sent to prison for 6 years. Shortly after his release in 1993 he began his murder spree. In total he is known to have raped 40 women, 38 of whom were strangled with their own underwear. On 5 Dec 1997, he was sent to prison for 2410 years with eligibility for parole in 930 years. He is incarcerated at Pretoria’s C-Max prison. IF South Africa had kept his profile on a DNA database after his first release from prison in 1993, he could have been identified and apprehended after his first victim was raped and killed – literally 37 women’s lives could have been saved!

Many of us will remember the tragic case of nine-month-old “Baby Tshepang” who was attacked and viciously raped in 2001. Her injuries were so substantial that gang rape was assumed. This horrifying attack provoked outrage in the local community and six men were swiftly arrested and subsequently spent three months in jail. All six men lost their jobs. However, DNA tests later revealed that there was a sole rapist and that none of the accused had a DNA profile that matched that of the assailant. The six falsely accused men were immediately released and exonerated of the crime. David Potse, a former boyfriend of Baby Tshepang’s mother, was arrested and shown to be an exact DNA match with the rapist. He was sentenced to life imprisonment. This case was particularly revolutionary in South Africa where DNA proved the innocence of 6 people and led to the conviction of the rapist. In South Africa the conviction rate for child rape is a mere three percent.

On 6 June 2011 Shavani Phophi, known as the Muldersdrift rapist, was found guilty of 6 rapes, 3 robberies with aggravating circumstance, and two cases of theft. Five of the rape victims were adult women who Phophi offered work and then lured to Nooitgedacht to rape them in the veld. The InvestigativePsychology Unit of the SAPS utilized a number of strategies, including DNA, to successfully link all of the adult rape cases and to locate the suspect in his shack in KyaSands. After arrest the suspect was then also linked through the DNA database to a rape of a 10-year-old girl in 2005. Without the database, the case of the little girl would not have otherwise come to the attention of the police, as the other victims were adult females raped between June 2009 and May 2010. Sentencing is due to take place on 2nd August.

Given the extremely high rates of recidivism in South Africa,the potential for our DNA database to help solve and prevent crime is substantial.  DNA analysis cannot stop the first crime from occurring, but it can provide investigators with the tools they need to identity a suspect and remove the threat to public safety before the same perpetrator can re-offend.

Carolyn